An Excerpt from the Introduction to The Boundless Garden: Selected Short Stories, Volume I
by Alexandros Papadiamandis
Introduction by Lambros Kamperidis
"Alexandros Papadiamantis (1851-1911) was the most important literary figure of nineteenth-century Greece and arguably of modern
Greek literature more generally. Through his lively, tender, and profound short stories of the simple lives of the Orthodox faithful of his native
island of Skiathos, Papadiamantis reveals a world of organically lived Orthodoxy, largely lost in the disintegrating order of modern life." (From
the forthcoming book by Protecting Veil Press entitled Greece's Dostoevsky: The Theological Vision of Alexandros
Papadiamantis). I cannot think of a better way succinctly to state why everyone, but especially Orthodox Christians,
should read the writings of Alexandros Papadiamandis. I mentioned him recently in the context of the writings
of Elder Paisios the Athonite. Now I am very happy to announce this outstanding translation of his short stories. May his wonderful descriptions of
"organically lived Orthodoxy" help us to recover a more full and traditional Orthodox way of life. Patrick Barnes
The short stories of Alexandros Papadiamandis are graced with an almost indefinable quality common to all great writers. This
quality would seem to derive from an enthralment combined with a certain perplexity,
an irresistible pull exerted by the author's descriptions of a world of beauty and
marvels which at the same time is filled with predicaments, human tragedies and
humble triumphs. Like his contemporaries in the great European tradition of story-telling,
Papadiamandis explores the souls of men and women as they succumb to or struggle
against the power of evil the Raskolnikovs, the Uriah Heeps and the Kareninas
people living on the edge of man's capacity to deal with evil and who are tragically
driven, by an irrational process, to the extremes of human vulnerability.
Papadiamandis knew this European
tradition intimately, learning his craft while translating many of the major authors
of his time Dostoyevsky, Chekhov, de Maupassant and Alphonse Daudet as well
as some of the minor literary figures, including Bram Stoker, Hall Caine, Bret Harte,
Georges Ohnet, [1] and although he himself objected to it, he was even compared
by some of his contemporaries to Edgar Allan Poe and Charles Dickens, most likely
because of the tragic tenor of his work and his habit of marking Christmas and Easter
by turning out a seasonal story. His literary field of reference, however, extended
far beyond the nineteenth century and along with Homer, Plato and Hesiod he also
drew on Dante and Shakespeare, easily integrating scenes and passages from their
works into his writing.
Papadiamandis lived in the
midst of an uncertain age of transition. Born in the middle of the nineteenth century
(1851) in a period of post-Enlightenment turmoil and a generation after Greece's
War of Independence, his reflections on and observations of Greek life in both his
native island of Skiathos and in urban Athens continue, almost a century after his
death, to define the modern Greek experience in a way unattained by any of his now
forgotten contemporaries.
The century that separates
today's reader from the world of Papadiamandis has brought a radical transformation
in the political, social and religious landscape of the world he describes. This
complex landscape has undergone so many changes during the past hundred years that
the way people inhabited it and related to one another, the objects that surrounded
them, the animals and inanimate things that defined it all of which he describes
so compellingly have utterly disappeared or have been transformed out of all recognition.
These changes inevitably influence the way we view his world, a world which no longer
exists. The attentive reader will realize, however, that this is not solely due
to a temporal distance: Papadiamandis himself was also alienated from the literary
and religious establishment of his day. Several of his stories reveal his rejection
of the conventional assumptions of his time concerning events such as the liberation
of Greece from the Turks, the reign of the Bavarian regent, Otho, the ideological
alignment with the West, the revival of the Olympic Games, or social idées reçues
such as the position of unmarried women.
Nevertheless one cannot simply
assert that Papadiamandis was as much misunderstood and misinterpreted in his day
as he appears to have been in our times. In recent years, he has acquired both enthusiasts
and detractors, each group of critics focusing on its own area of interest, dividing,
as it were, the seamless garment of his work into reductive, conflicting pieces,
none of which fit or do justice to the whole fabric of his vision. Separated from
the whole, each becomes a caricature. He has been claimed by the religious establishment
as one of their own, hailed by the social ethnographers as a natural if instinctive
folklorist, decried by the Greek modernists as a reactionary, and remains a scandal
to both sides of the purist versus the demotic language question. [2]
Papadiamandis resists all such easy or narrow classifications....
In this first volume there
are Christmas and Easter stories;
a tale of displacement and alienation experienced
by a young student, ironically unfolding on the last night of Carnival; a personal
tragedy of loss and exile seen through the eyes of the monk who has abandoned his
monastery to live as a stranger in a world that cannot contain him; details from
the lives of the seafaring islanders and their fascinating, long-forgotten rites
at the launching of a new ship all these elements still reflect the inner life
of a 'modern' Greece in search of its soul. With an innate sense of what is happening
around him, Papadiamandis grounds his stories in the realization that something
irretrievable is in the process of being lost or has already been lost. While everyone
is preoccupied with new distractions, adopting ways that have not been tested and
unravelling what has taken centuries of spiritual evolution to achieve, the close-knit
sense of community of country life and the relationship with another reality is
being destroyed. This profound loss encompassed spiritual, social and political
implications. With the creation of the modern Greek state, what was gained by the
liberation from the Turks was lost in the new order that accompanied the Bavarian
regency. It ushered in a highly centralized, impersonal, western style of government
that soon replaced the local independent and autonomous administration of neighbourhoods
and communities radiating from the nucleus of church and parish life. This bureaucratic
process was democratically enforced through the new phenomenon of state-run elections.
Papadiamandis went so far as to question even the most nationalistic assumptions
of the modern Greek state and intimated, with a subtle sense of irony, that there
was little difference between the former domination of the Greeks by the Turks and
the present liberation imposed upon them by the Bavarians. 'Ah, the elections! This
has been our sole preoccupation for the past seventy years since we have been liberated,
that is, since we exchanged tyrants, whom we believe we may replace even more frequently
by the means of elections ...' In the face of this erosion of the spiritual and
social elements which held his world together, Papadiamandis holds up the image
of another reality, manifested in a belief that this world was grounded in the supernatural
world and taking tangible form in the worship of God and His saints, and which relates
human beings to their saintly counterparts and every temporal or material aspect
of their earthly existence to the eternal.
Papadiamandis believed that
the only unifying principle capable of counteracting the erosion taking place in
the natural world was the Church. He saw the Church from the traditional Greek Orthodox
point of view as a microcosm of the Kingdom of God, recreated on earth in the festal
cycle of the Church's liturgical year. As a living reality providing a foretaste
of the Kingdom of Heaven here on earth, the Church is not solely a manifestation
of metaphysical ideas; it is the living Body of Christ. The priests who appear so
frequently in the stories are fully integrated into the life of the community; they
are married and must look after their large families; they lead ordinary, if not
mundane lives within that society; they carry out the given ecclesiastical rites
and together with their flock form a cohesive, homogeneous body. Like shepherds,
they lead their parishioners through valleys, over mountains, on perilous voyages
in stormy seas, in order to reach a deserted country chapel and revive it by celebrating
a liturgy, in the company of goatherds and illiterate chanters who recite the sacred
texts as well as their flawed memory permits. These priests are not hermits, meditating
alone in their cells; rather, their mission in life is to merge with that of the
people, to give life to the community, to keep alive the memory of places threatened
by extinction, to be witnesses to that unified reality which animates everything
with the living breath of the Holy Spirit. The liturgy, the consummation of the
eucharistic unity of the Church's flock the work of the people is never, as
it often seems to be in western religious practice, a private matter between the
priest and God: it must involve all the participants, as they clean and prepare
the holy altar and the church, light the fires that will keep all warm during the
long night vigils, lay out the liturgical vessels, chant the necessary hymns and
responses, and, finally, partake of a common meal, an indispensable component of
the liturgy, drinking and eating with hearty rejoicing.
All the elements that contribute
to the naturally supernatural reality of this liturgical, sacramental, ever-present
'now', as recorded by Papadiamandis, survive in these sacred rites. They include
pagan beliefs of a remote past, supernatural stories and fairy-tales that have been
transmitted orally for generations and retold in the very places whence they arose;
magic incantations, spells and charms that have even crept into liturgical practices
and now form a seamless whole preserved within the life of the Church. The natural
world forms a living part of the liturgical 'now'. The spirits of the past lurk
and hide everywhere, the elements acquire an other-worldly aura: the moon, the stars,
the Pleiades casting their faint light over the sea in the depth of the night; a
rock emerging from the waters like a mysterious human figure; the translucent daylight,
the animals, trees assuming the form of the nymph who inhabits them, the fruits
of the earth, and a myriad of natural phenomena are all transformed in the liturgical
cosmos of Papadiamandis. These are so vividly described that it becomes possible
to behold in nature the sacred, indelible stamp of the Creator, whose life-giving
breath, the holy aura that inspires everything with divine life, moves the natural
world, both pagan and Christian, towards its eternal source.
If Papadiamandis insists
on an elaborate description of the rites associated with this life, most of them
of an ecclesiastical nature, it is not because he delights in recording forgotten
or quaintly irrelevant rituals, but because he perceives them as the authentic expression
of a collective practice that providentially unites earthly life with heavenly realities
into which the people can still pour their souls and declare their instinctive desire
for a traditional way of life. Whenever this sense of the breath of the Holy Spirit
ceases to be acknowledged as the source of life, everything begins to disintegrate
and is threatened with extinction, as described in the tragic story of 'Village
Civilization'. Here the new ways that have been introduced into the island are the
indirect cause of killing off, in an almost demonic way, its hope for the future
its children.
Papadiamandis was well aware of the
universal presence and power of evil and knew that by no means can one attribute
all ills to the advent of the new mores. In his determination to explore the dark
depths of the human soul and its capacity for sin in the absence of God, he reveals
the universal human predicament in the lives of the people and the social order
he depicts, a literary achievement far beyond mere descriptions of a traditional
way of life. Nor does he espouse the heedless idealization of traditional rural
customs offered by many of his contemporaries who excelled in the ethnographic depiction
of life, tinged with local colour. According to Papadiamandis, there are vestiges
of human paganism that remain unredeemed by Christianity, just as there are ancient
spirits lurking in the natural world. 'One touch of nature makes the whole world
kin.' [3] It is interesting to note that all the heinous acts in his stories
occur in the idyllic setting of Skiathos, while almost no crime is committed in
the urban environment of alienation that one would more typically associate with
Athens.
Papadiamandis's insistence
on an authentic expression of reality that which we have heard, which we have seen
with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled
[4]
extends equally to the way he presents and describes characters, events, landscapes,
the ever-changing sea, a newly-launched tall ship or a run-down boat. His characters
emerge from the narrative as they are, not as they ought to be; they merge
with life rather than imposing themselves on it; they are not subjected to ethical
scrutiny, neither are they judged according to their merits or failures. Their greatest
worth is their humanity. They are at one with their environment: in village and
city, in Skiathos and in Athens, whether they are traversing the seas of the Aegean
or braving the whims of wind and wave in little boats, they are natural extensions
of the world they inhabit, necessarily involved in the ebb and flow of good and
evil, the constant flux of life and death. They live, they do not simply cope with
life. They assume fully their commitment to life, knowing with resigned equanimity
that they must be subjected to both good fortune and calamity.
It is fair to say that the
growing contemporary preoccupation with and re-evaluation of the work of Papadiamandis
convey a measure of its relevance for our times. Nearly a century after his death
(1911), his imaginative insight of the Greek way of life, his uncompromising attitude
with regard to the dilemmas plaguing the newly-created nation on the threshold of
modernity, his caustic humour directed against those who vitiated the traditional
ways, and his unyielding defense of ancestral values and revealed truths would seem
to have been sufficient reason a generation ago to relegate him to oblivion. The
enduring relevance of his work today is a living proof of the persistent significance
of its message.
Lambros Kamperidis, May 2007
Endnotes
- Lakis Proguidis, in his La conquête du roman – de Papadiamantis à Boccace, Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 1997, places the work of Papadiamandis in the European tradition and convincingly argues in favour of his undisputed place among the literary giants of the West. Mohammed Dib argues along the same lines in Simorgh, Albin Michel, Paris, 2003, p. 239–47.
- The language question was officially sanctioned as a national issue after the creation of the modern Greek state following the 1821 War of Independence from the Turks. Ironically, it was Adamandios Koraïs, a philologist living in Paris and a fervent spokesman for the introduction of the ideas of the Enlightenment in the nascent state of Greece, who promoted the idea of purifying the language from vulgar words and expressions, with a view to correcting the colloquial speech of the people so they could conform to the noble image of their ancestors; for Koraïs believed that the modern Greeks were the descendants of their ancient compatriots. This initiated the movement for the 'purist' language, katharévousa. The populist movement on the other hand espoused the language of the people, demotiki, in which it discerned a living source of pure linguistic forms and poetic sensitivity. It was this language that was taken up by the national poet Dionysios Solomos, who admirably expressed its merits as a medium for revealing the truths inherent in the worldview of the Greek people. The language debate continued until the final decades of the twentieth century.
- Shakespeare, Troilus and Cressida, III, iii, 176-9.
- I John 1 : 1.
+ + +
Biographical Note
Alexandros Papadiamandis was born on 4th March
1851 on the small island of Skiathos just off the north-east coast of Euboea, so
named because the shadow skiá of the northerly great holy mountain
of Athos cast by the rising sun stretches across the Aegean as far as the island.
His father, the priest Adamandios Emmanuel familiarly addressed as Papa-Diamandis
came from a nautical family which in earlier years had counted monastics and abbots
amongst its members. His mother, Angeliki, was the daughter of Alexandros Moraïti
who belonged to one of Skiathos's land-owning families and after whom he was named.
His parents had nine children, two of which died at birth. Alexandros was their
fourth child and eldest living son.
The young Alexandros had
a diverse and interrupted education. He was schooled on his island until the age
of eleven but as there were no further classes offered he spent the next three years
mainly helping his father in his pastoral duties. In 1865 he was sent to the high
school on the nearby more affluent island of Skopelos. He was given the grade of
A for that year and described by his teacher as 'entirely praiseworthy', but because
of his family's economic difficulties he had to interrupt his schooling and return
to Skiathos. The following year, in 1867, his parents were able to send him to the
gymnasium in Chalkis, the capital town of Euboea, which he attended for two years,
and for his third year he went to the gymnasium in Piraeus, but in February of 1870,
after only four months at the Piraeus school, he left and returned to Skiathos.
In 1872 he travelled to Mount
Athos with a childhood friend, who was later to become a monk, the one referred
to as Niphon in his story 'The Monk', where they stayed until the end of the year.
It is understood that Papadiamandis seriously considered joining a monastery at
that time but he nevertheless returned once more to his island. The following year,
after taking preliminary examinations, he was enrolled in the fourth class of the
Varvakeio gymnasium of Athens from which he graduated in 1874, and then registered
at the Philosophical School of the University of Athens. He attended the University
for two years and one of his professors remarked on him being regularly present
at lectures, but he was never to obtain his degree. It was during this period that
his cousin, Alexandros Moraïtidis, introduced him into various journalistic circles.
In 1877 he was recruited
into the army in which he briefly served until being given a deferment as a student
even though he was no longer attending the university but struggling to earn a living
as a journalist and writer. Papadiamandis experienced great economic difficulties
during this period and frequently had to ask for money from his father.
Following the recommendation
of one of his new journalistic acquaintances, Vlasios Gavrielidis, Papadiamandis's
first novel, a work of some 50,000 words entitled The Migrant, was printed
in instalments in the Constantinopolitan newspaper Neologos in 1879. He was
conscripted again in September of 1880, served until July of the following year,
and not long after being released from the army his first literary work to be published
in Greece, a poem entitled 'Supplication', appeared. A year later a more substantial
second novel, The Merchants of the Nations, began to be published, again
in instalments, in the Athenian newspaper Mi Hanesai, and at the same time
Papadiamandis started to work as a translator for the Ephimeris newspaper.
Two years later, in 1884, his longest novel, The Gypsy Girl, a work of more
than 130,000 words, was published in Gavrielidis's newspaper, The Acropolis,
and the following year his novel Christos Milionis was printed in the literary
journal Estia.
It wasn't, however, until
Christmas of 1887 that Papadiamandis's first short story The Christmas Loaf
was to appear, marking the feast and setting a pattern for his writing. The métier
of the short story subsequently became his favoured form, and no doubt it was an
easier form for him to accommodate within his inordinately long working days at
various newspapers. Many of these hours were spent in translating major European
novels, such as Crime and Punishment, Quo Vadis, Dracula, and The Manxman,
which appeared in daily instalments, as well as numerous short stories by such writers
as Chekhov, Bret Harte and Jerome K. Jerome, in addition to translating works of
non-fiction. He relieved the incredible strain he subjected himself to by frequenting
wine shops and chain-smoking but these all too human habits did not prevent him
from regularly attending church services in which he acted as chanter and beadle.
It was in 1887 that he found
what could be described as his spiritual bolt-hole in the turbulent and often harsh
world of the metropolis: the small church of the Prophet Elisha, set in the courtyard
of a private house in the old part of the city, under the rock of the Acropolis.
There Papa-Nicholaos Planas, a simple priest born in the same year as Papadiamandis,
a man of prayer and of great spiritual gifts, would regularly hold vigil services,
gathering people from all walks of life into the crucible of the little church.
Papa-Nicholaos was canonized in 1992.
Papadiamandis never married.
He was a shy and retiring man, as the few extant photographs of him testify, a man
seemingly not of this world despite his acute observations of it. He also had to
provide for his unmarried sisters at home. But despite his introspective nature
he had a small circle of close friends, including Pavlos Nirvanas and Yiannis Vlachoyiannis,
well-known Athenian men of letters who at various times undertook the role of literary
agents and helped him during hard times.
Except for two years when
he returned to Skiathos, 1902–4, during which time he wrote his perhaps most powerful
tale, The Murderess, a short novel about an old woman who thought it better
to kill female infants so they should not have to endure the tribulations that life
brings upon women, he continued to live in Athens, writing and translating, until
1908. That year, in March, the Parnassos literary society held an event in his honour
under the patronage of Princess Maria Bonaparte: typically Papadiamandis was not
present and spent the evening dining with the family of his grocer friend. But despite
this recognition and the popularity of his stories, it would seem that none of his
own writing was published in book form during his lifetime.
Shortly afterwards he returned
to Skiathos where he lived from then on, cared for in turn by his sisters. In the
winter of 1910 he fell ill with a severe chest infection, and died on 2nd January
1911 after having chanted the troparion of the forthcoming feast of Epiphany.
From the Introduction to The Boundless Garden: Selected Short Stories, Volume I, by Alexandros Papadiamandis
(Limni, Evia, Greece: Denise Harvey (Publisher), 2007), pp. xiii-xv, xx-xv. This book is distributed in North America
by Uncut Mountain Supply. Posted March 22, 2008 with the permission of the publisher. Look
for an important forthcoming book on Papadiamantis from the publisher who
brought you Precious Vessels of the Holy Spirit.
|