The Church is the Pillar and Ground of Truth (1 Timothy 3:15)
Overview
The Church defended Herself against
heretical teachings by appealing to two key things: the apostolic
origins of Holy Tradition, as proved by Apostolic Succession, and
by appealing to the universality of the Orthodox Faith. The
Church also defended Herself against spurious and heretical books
by establishing an authoritative list of sacred books that were
received throughout the Church as being divinely inspired and of
genuine Old Testament or apostolic origin.
It should be noted that in the Nicene Creed,
which most Protestants accept, we confess not only belief in the
Holy Spirit but also in His primary locus of activity, the
Church: "and in one, holy, catholic, and apostolic
Church." This is something that Protestants have typically
overlooked or misinterpreted. It is quite revealing that the only
reference to the Scriptures in the entire Creed is in the section
regarding Christ's suffering and death. There is no reference to
a belief in a particular canon of Scripture, or in the
Scriptures themselves, but in the Church.
Scripture References
In addition to the excerpt from Jordan Bajis' Common Ground on tradition):
- John 21:25 "And there
were so many other things that Jesus did, which if they
were written one by one, I suppose that even the world
itself could not contain the books that would be
written."
- Acts 20:35 this quote is
recorded in the Gospels as something Jesus said: ".
. . And remember the words of the Lord Jesus, that He
said, 'It is more blessed to give than to receive.'"
Quotes from the Early Church Fathers
St. Irenaeus: Against All Heresies
(A student of St. Polycarp, a disciple of the apostle John)
I, 10
2. As I have already observed, the Church,
having received this preaching and this faith, although scattered
throughout the whole world, yet, as if occupying but one house,
carefully preserves it. She also believes these points [of
doctrine] just as if she had but one soul, and one and the same
heart, and she proclaims them, and teaches them, and hands them
down, with perfect harmony, as if she possessed only one mouth.
For, although the languages of the world are dissimilar, yet the
import of the tradition is one and the same. For the Churches
which have been planted in Germany do not believe or hand down
anything different, nor do those in Spain, nor those in Gaul,
nor those in the East, nor those in Egypt, nor those in Libya,
nor those which have been established in the central regions of
the world. But as the sun, that creature of God, is one and the
same throughout the whole world, so also the preaching of the
truth shines everywhere, and enlightens all men that are willing
to come to a knowledge of the truth. Nor will any one of the
rulers in the Churches, however highly gifted he may be in point
of eloquence, teach doctrines different from these (for no one is
greater than the Master [the Church]); nor, on the other
hand, will he who is deficient in power of expression inflict
injury on the tradition. For the faith being ever one and the
same, neither does one who is able at great length to discourse
regarding it, make any addition to it, nor does one, who can say
but little diminish it.
III, 3
It is within the power of all, therefore, in
every Church, who may wish to see the truth, to contemplate
clearly the tradition of the apostles manifested throughout the
whole world; and we are in a position to reckon up those who were
by the apostles instituted bishops in the Churches, and [to
demonstrate] the succession of these men to our own times; those
who neither taught nor knew of anything like what these
[heretics] rave about... .
2. Since, however, it would be very tedious, in
such a volume as this, to reckon up the successions of all the
Churches, we do put to confusion all those who, in whatever
manner, whether by an evil self-pleasing, by vainglory, or by
blindness and perverse opinion, assemble in unauthorized
meetings; [we do this, I say,] by indicating that tradition
derived from the apostles, of the very great, the very ancient,
and universally known Church founded and organized at Rome by the
two most glorious apostles, Peter and Paul; as also [by pointing
out] the faith preached to men, which comes down to our time
by means of the successions of the bishops. For it is a
matter of necessity that every Church should agree with this
Church, on account of its pre-eminent authority, . . .
III,4
1. Since therefore we have such proofs, it is
not necessary to seek the truth among others which it is easy
to obtain from the Church; since the apostles, like a rich
man [depositing his money] in a bank, lodged in her hands most
copiously all things pertaining to the truth: so that every man,
whosoever will, can draw from her the water of life. For she
is the entrance to life; all others are thieves and robbers.
On this account are we bound to avoid them, but to make choice of
the thing pertaining to the Church with the utmost diligence, and
to lay hold of the tradition of the truth. For how stands the
case? Suppose there arise a dispute relative to some important
question among us, should we not have recourse to the most
ancient Churches with which the apostles held constant
intercourse, and learn from them what is certain and clear in
regard to the present question? For how should it be if the
apostles themselves had not left us writings? Would it not be
necessary, [in that case,] to follow the course of the tradition
which they handed down to those to whom they did commit the
Churches?
IV,33
8. True knowledge is [that which consists in]
the doctrine of the apostles, and the ancient constitution of the
Church throughout all the world, and the distinctive
manifestation of the Body of Christ according to the successions
of the bishops, by which they have handed down that Church which
exists in every place, and has come even unto us, being guarded
and preserved without any forging of Scriptures, by a very
complete system of doctrine, and neither receiving addition nor
[suffering] curtailment [in the truths which she believes]; and
[it consists in] reading [the word of God] without falsification,
and a lawful and diligent exposition in harmony with the
Scriptures, both without danger and without blasphemy; and [above
all, it consists in] the pre-eminent gift of love, which is more
precious than knowledge, more glorious than prophecy, and which
excels all the other gifts [of God].
V,20
1. Now all these [heretics] are of much later
date than the bishops to whom the apostles committed the
Churches; which fact I have in the third book taken all pains to
demonstrate. It follows, then, as a matter of course, that these
heretics aforementioned, since they are blind to the truth, and
deviate from the [right] way, will walk in various roads; and
therefore the footsteps of their doctrine are scattered here and
there without agreement or connection. But the path of those
belonging to the Church circumscribes the whole world, as
possessing the sure tradition from the apostles, and gives unto
us to see that the faith of all is one and the same, since
all receive one and the same God the Father, and believe in the
same dispensation regarding the incarnation of the Son of God,
and are cognizant of the same gift of the Spirit, and are
conversant with the same commandments, and preserve the same
form of ecclesiastical constitution, and expect the same
advent of the Lord, and await the same salvation of the complete
man, that is, of the soul and body. And undoubtedly the preaching
of the Church is true and steadfast, in which one and the same
way of salvation is shown throughout the whole world. For to
her is entrusted the light of God; and therefore the
"wisdom" of God, by means of which she saves all men,
"is declared in [its] going forth; it uttereth [its voice]
faithfully in the streets, is preached on the tops of the walls,
and speaks continually in the gates of the city." For the
Church preaches the truth everywhere, and she is the
seven-branched candlestick which bears the light of Christ.
I,8 [Ireneaus discusses heretical
methods of interpreting the Scripture]
1. Such, then, is their system, which neither
the prophets announced, nor the Lord taught, nor the apostles
delivered, but of which they boast that beyond all others they
have a perfect knowledge... they disregard the order and the
connection of the Scriptures, and so far as in them lies,
dismember and destroy the truth. By transferring passages, and
dressing them up anew, and making one thing out of another, they
succeed in deluding many through their wicked art in adapting the
oracles of the Lord to their opinions. Their manner of acting is
just as if one, when a beautiful image of a king has been
constructed by some skillful artist out of precious jewels,
should then take this likeness of the man all to pieces, should
rearrange the gems, and so fit them together as to make them into
the form of a dog or of a fox, and even that but poorly executed;
and should then maintain and declare that this was the beautiful
image of the king which the skillful artist constructed, pointing
to the jewels which had been admirably fitted together by the
first artist to form the image of the king, but have been with
bad effect transferred by the latter one to the shape of a dog,
and by thus exhibiting the jewels, should deceive the ignorant
who had no conception what a king's form was like, and persuade
them that that miserable likeness of the fox was, in fact, the
beautiful image of the king. In like manner do these persons
patch together old wives' fables, and then endeavour, by
violently drawing away from their proper connection, words,
expressions, and parables whenever found, to adapt the oracles of
God to their baseless fictions. We have already stated how far
they proceed in this way with respect to the interior of the
Pleroma [the fullness of the Faith or Tradition].
Tertullian: Prescription Against the Heretics
(Considered by all to be the most important
theologian of the 2nd century)
CHAP. XIX. APPEAL, IN DISCUSSION OF HERESY, LIES NOT TO
THE SCRIPTURES. THE SCRIPTURES BELONG ONLY TO THOSE WHO HAVE THE
RULE OF FAITH
Our appeal, therefore, must not be made to
the Scriptures; nor must controversy be admitted on points in
which victory will either be impossible, or uncertain, or not
certain enough. But even if a discussion from the Scriptures
should not turn out in such a way as to place both sides on a
par, the natural order of things would require that this point
should be first proposed, which is now the only one which we must
discuss: "With whom lies that very faith to which the
Scriptures belong. From what and through whom, and when, and to
whom, has been handed down that rule, by which men become
Christians?" For wherever it shall be manifest that the true
Christian rule and faith shall be, there will likewise be the
true Scriptures and expositions thereof, and all the Christian
traditions.
CHAP. XX.CHRIST FIRST DELIVERED THE
FAITH. THE APOSTLES SPREAD IT; THEY FOUNDED CHURCHES AS THE
DEPOSITORIES THEREOF. THAT FAITH, THEREFORE, IS APOSTOLIC, WHICH
DESCENDED FROM THE APOSTLES, THROUGH APOSTOLIC CHURCHES.
Christ Jesus our Lord (may He bear with me a
moment in thus expressing myself!), whosoever He is, of what God
soever He is the Son, of what substance soever He is man and God,
of what faith soever He is the, teacher, of what reward soever He
is the Promiser, did, whilst He lived on earth, Himself declare
what He was, what He had been, what the Father's will was which
He was administering, what the duty of man was which He was
prescribing; (and this declaration He made,) either openly to the
people, or privately to His disciples, of whom He had chosen the
twelve chief ones to be at His side, and whom He destined to be
the teachers of the nations. Accordingly, after one of these had
been struck off, He commanded the eleven others, on His departure
to the Father, to "go and teach all nations, who were to be
baptized into the Father, and into the Son, and into the Holy
Ghost." Immediately, therefore, so did the apostles, whom
this designation indicates as "the sent." Having, on
the authority of a prophecy, which occurs in a psalm of David,
chosen Matthias by lot as the twelfth, into the place of Judas,
they obtained the promised power of the Holy Ghost for the gift
of miracles and of utterance; and after first bearing witness to
the faith in Jesus Christ throughout Judaea, and rounding
churches (there), they next went forth into the world and
preached the same doctrine of the same faith to the nations. They
then in like manner rounded churches in every city, from which
all the other churches, one after another, derived the tradition
of the faith, and the seeds of doctrine, and are every day
deriving them, that they may become churches. Indeed, it is on
this account only that they will be able to deem themselves
apostolic, as being the offspring of apostolic churches. Every
sort of thing must necessarily revert to its original for its
classification. Therefore the churches, although they are so many
and so great, comprise but the one primitive church, (rounded) by
the apostles, from which they all (spring). In this way all are
primitive, and all are apostolic, whilst they are all proved to
be one, in (unbroken) unity, by their peaceful communion, and
title of brotherhood, and bond of hospitality,privileges which
no other rule directs than the one tradition of the selfsame
mystery.
CHAP. XXI.ALL DOCTRINE TRUE WHICH
COMES THROUGH THE CHURCH FROM THE APOSTLES, WHO WERE TAUGHT BY
GOD THROUGH CHRIST. ALL OPINION WHICH HAS NO SUCH DIVINE ORIGIN
AND APOSTOLIC TRADITION TO SHOW, IS IPSO FACTO FALSE.
From this, therefore, do we draw up our rule.
Since the Lord Jesus Christ sent the apostles to preach, (our
rule is) that no others ought to be received as preachers than
those whom Christ appointed [that is, have apostolic succession];
for "no man knoweth the Father save the Son, and he to
whomsoever the Son will reveal Him." Nor does the Son seem
to have revealed Him to any other than the apostles, whom He sent
forth to preachthat, of course, which He revealed to them. Now,
what that was which they preachedin other words, what it
was which Christ revealed to themcan, as I must here
likewise prescribe, properly be proved in no other way than by
those very churches which the apostles rounded in person, by
declaring the gospel to them directly themselves, both rivet
race, as the phrase is, and subsequently by their epistles. If,
then, these things are so, it is in the same degree manifest that
all doctrine which agrees with the apostolic churchesthose
molds and original sources of the faith must be reckoned for
truth, as undoubtedly containing that which the (said) churches
received from the apostles, the apostles from Christ, Christ from
God. Whereas all doctrine must be prejudged as false which
savors of contrariety to the truth of the churches and apostles
of Christ and God. It remains, then, that we demonstrate
whether this doctrine of ours, of which we have now given the
rule, has its origin in the tradition of the apostles, and
whether all other doctrines do not ipso facto proceed from
falsehood. We hold communion with the apostolic churches
because our doctrine is in no respect different from theirs. This
is our witness of truth.
CHAP. XXII.ATTEMPT TO INVALIDATE THIS
RULE OF FAITH REBUTTED. THE APOSTLES SAFE TRANSMITTERS OF THE
TRUTH. SUFFICIENTLY TAUGHT AT FIRST, AND FAITHFUL IN THE
TRANSMISSION.
... He (thus) shows that there was nothing of
which they were ignorant, to whom He had promised the future
attainment of all truth by help of the Spirit of truth. And
assuredly He fulfilled His promise, since it is proved in the
Acts of the Apostles that the Holy Ghost did come down. Now they
who reject that Scripture can neither belong to the Holy Spirit,
seeing that they cannot acknowledge that the Holy Ghost has been
sent as yet to the disciples, nor can they presume to claim to
be a church themselves who positively have no means of proving
when, and with what swaddling-clothes this body was established.
CHAP. XXVIII.THE ONE TRADITION OF THE
FAITH, WHICH IS SUBSTANTIALLY ALIKE IN THE CHURCHES EVERYWHERE, A
GOOD PROOF THAT THE TRANSMISSION HAS BEEN TRUE AND HONEST IN THE
MAIN.
[Suppose for a moment], then, that all have
erred; that the apostle was mistaken in giving his testimony;
that the Holy Ghost had no such respect to any one (church) as to
lead it into truth, although sent with this view by Christ, and
for this asked of the Father that He might be the teacher of
truth; grant, also, that He, the Steward of God, the Vicar of
Christ, neglected His office, permitting the churches for a time
to understand differently, (and) to believe differently, what He
Himself was preaching by the apostles,is it likely that so many
churches, and they so great, should have gone astray into one
and the same faith? No casualty distributed among many men
issues in one and the same result. Error of doctrine in the
churches must necessarily have produced various issues. When,
however, that which is deposited among many is found to be one
and the same, it is not the result of error, but of tradition. Can
any one, then, be reckless enough to say that they were in error
who handed on the tradition?
CHAP.XXXII.NONE OF THE HERETICS CLAIM
SUCCESSION FROM THE APOSTLES. NEW CHURCHES STILL APOSTOLIC,
BECAUSE THEIR FAITH IS THAT WHICH THE APOSTLES TAUGHT AND HANDED
DOWN. THE HERETICS CHALLENGED TO SHOW ANY APOSTOLIC CREDENTIALS.
But if there be any (heresies) which are bold
enough to plant themselves in the midst of the apostolic age,
that they may thereby seem to have been handed down by the
apostles, because they existed in the time of the apostles, we
can say: Let them produce the original records of their
churches; let them unfold the roll of their bishops, running down
in due succession from the beginning in such a manner that [that
first bishop of theirs] bishop shall be able to show for his
ordainer and predecessor some one of the apostles or of apostolic
men,a man, moreover, who continued steadfast with the
apostles. For this is the manner in which the apostolic churches
transmit their registers: as the church of Smyrna, which records
that Polycarp was placed therein by John; as also the church of
Rome, which makes Clement to have been ordained in like manner by
Peter. In exactly the same way the other churches likewise
exhibit (their several worthies), whom, as having been
appointed to their episcopal places by apostles, they regard as
transmitters of the apostolic seed. Let the heretics contrive
something of the same kind. For after their blasphemy, what is
there that is unlawful for them (to attempt)? But should they
even effect the contrivance, they will not advance a step. For
their very doctrine, after comparison with that of the apostles,
will declare, by its own diversity and contrariety, that it had
for its author neither an apostle nor an apostolic man; because,
as the apostles would never have taught things which were
self-contradictory, so the apostolic men would not have
inculcated teaching different from the apostles, unless they who
received their instruction from the apostles went and preached in
a contrary manner. To this test, therefore will they be submitted
for proof by those churches, who, although they derive not their
founder from apostles or apostolic men (as being of much later
date, for they are in fact being founded daily), yet, since they
agree in the same faith, they are accounted as not less apostolic
because they are akin in doctrine. Then let all the heresies,
when challenged to these two tests by our apostolic church, offer
their proof of how they deem themselves to be apostolic. But in
truth they neither are so, nor are they able to prove themselves
to be what they are not. Nor are they admitted to peaceful
relations and communion by such churches as are in any way
connected with apostles, inasmuch as they are in no sense
themselves apostolic because of their diversity as to the
mysteries of the faith.
CHAP. XXXVII.HERETICS NOT BEING
CHRISTIANS, BUT RATHER PERVERTERS OF CHRIST'S TEACHING, MAY NOT
CLAIM THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES. THESE ARE A DEPOSIT, COMMITTED TO
AND CAREFULLY KEPT BY THE CHURCH.
Since this is the case, in order that the truth
may be adjudged to belong to us, "as many as walk according
to the rule," which the church has handed down from the
apostles, the apostles from Christ, and Christ from God, the
reason of our position is clear, when it determines that heretics
ought not to be allowed to challenge an appeal to the Scriptures,
since we, without the Scriptures, prove that they have nothing to
do with the Scriptures. For as they are heretics, they cannot be
true Christians, because it is not from Christ that they get that
which they pursue of their own mere choice, and from the pursuit
incur and admit the name of heretics. Thus, not being Christians,
they have acquired no right to the Christian Scriptures; and it
may be very fairly said to them, "Who are you? When and
whence did you come? As you are none of mine, what have you to do
with that which is mine? Indeed, Marcion, by what right do you
hew my wood? By whose permission, Valentinus, are you diverting
the streams of my fountain? By what power, Apelles, are you
removing my landmarks? This is my property. Why are you, the
rest, sowing and feeding here at your own pleasure? This (I say)
is my property. I have long possessed it; I possessed it before
you. I hold sure title-deeds from the original owners themselves,
to whom the estate belonged. I am the heir of the apostles. Just
as they carefully prepared their will and testament, and
committed it to a trust, and adjured (the trustees to be faithful
to their charge), even so do I hold it. As for you, they have, it
is certain, always held you as disinherited, and rejected you as
strangersas enemies. But on what ground are heretics strangers
and enemies to the apostles, if it be not from the difference of
their teaching, which each individual of his own mere will has
either advanced or received in opposition to the apostles?"
Origen: On First Principles
Preface
2... .For as we ceased to seek for truth
(notwithstanding the professions of many among Greeks and
Barbarians to make it known) among all who claimed it for
erroneous opinions, after we had come to believe that Christ was
the Son of God, and were persuaded that we must learn it from
Himself; so, seeing there are many who think they hold the
opinions of Christ, and yet some of these think differently from
their predecessors, yet as the teaching of the Church,
transmitted in orderly succession from the apostles, and
remaining in the Churches to the present day, is still preserved,
that alone is to be accepted as truth which differs in no respect
from ecclesiastical and apostolical tradition.
St. Clement: I Clement
XLII.-The Order of Ministers in the Church
The apostles have preached the Gospel to us
from the Lord Jesus Christ; Jesus Christ [has done sol from God.
Christ therefore was sent forth by God, and the apostles by
Christ. Both these appointments, then, were made in an orderly
way, according to the will of God. Having therefore received
their orders, and being fully assured by the resurrection of our
Lord Jesus Christ, and established in the word of God, with full
assurance of the Holy Ghost, they went forth proclaiming that the
kingdom of God was at hand. And thus preaching through countries
and cities, they appointed the first-fruits [of their labours],
having first proved them by the Spirit, to be bishops and
deacons of those who should afterwards believe. Nor was this any
new thing, since indeed many ages before it was written
concerning bishops and deacons. For thus saith the Scripture
a certain place, "I will appoint their bishops in
righteousness, and their deacons in faith."
St. Cyprian
(Bishop of Carthage and Martyr for the faith in
258)
Ep 51.24
In reference, however, to the character of
Novatian, dearest brother, of whom you desired that intelligence
should be written you what heresy he had introduced; know that,
in the first place, we ought not even to be
inquisitive as to what he teaches, so long as
he teaches out of the pale of unity. Whoever he may be, and
whatever he may be, he who is not in the Church of Christ is not
a Christian. Although he may boast himself, and announce his
philosophy or eloquence with lofty words, yet he who has not
maintained brotherly love or ecclesiastical unity has lost even
what he previously had been... But apostates and deserters,
or adversaries and enemies, and those who lay waste the Church of
Christ, cannot, even if outside the Church they have been slain
for His name, according to the apostle, be admitted to the peace
of the Church, since they have neither kept the unity of the
spirit nor of the Church.
The Use of Non-Canonical Writings in the New Testament
by Joel Kalvesmaki
The Book of Enoch was highly regarded by the Apostles as it was
already a part of the Septuagint. In fact, one of Enoch's
prophecies is quoted word for word in the New Testament:
And about these also Enoch, in the seventh
generation from Adam, prophesied, saying, 'Behold, the Lord came
with many thousands of His holy ones, to execute judgment upon
all, and to convict all the ungodly of all their ungodly deeds
which they have done in an ungodly way, and of all the harsh
things which ungodly sinners have spoken against Him.' (Jude
14,15)
It doesn't matter so much that Jude says or
does not say that the book is inspired. No book is stated
as such in the New Testament. Rather Jude incorporates Enoch's
prophetic utterance as an authoritative crux of his argument. It
seems he assumes that the community to which he writes at least
preserves and reveres the work. Without these elements Jude's
argument is irrelevant.
Enoch's imagery is also woven into Revelation's
apocalyptic imagery and the Gospels' use of the term 'Son of
Man.' Although Enoch fell into disfavor in the fourth century,
the Ethiopian Orthodox Church retains it in their canon. (See
Barr, 41-50 on the implications of Jude's use of Enoch and the
New Testament use of the pseudepigrapha).
Other examples:
- Paul refers to the non-canonical book
Jannes and Jambres (II Tim 3:8) when naming the magicians
of Pharoah's court in Moses' time.
- Hebrews, in referring to those who were
"sawn in two," alludes to a book called the
Martyrdom of Isaiah (Heb 11:7).
- In addition to his use of the Book of
Enoch, Jude cites the Assumption of Moses when he
theologizes on the archangel Michael's dispute with the
devil over the body of Moses (Jude 9).
Further Orthodox Arguments
The Orthodox Church is definitely a "Bible
believin'" Church. Consider that:
- Our liturgy is almost entirely taken
directly from Scripture
- We read an Epistle and Gospel passage at
each liturgy, at the minimum. During Holy Week much more
is read, including an evening service incorporating the
reading of twelve Gospel passages. More scripture
is read in Orthodox Churches than Protestant ones!
- We are the Church of the Psalter. We sing
many psalms each week, and all of our hymns are
psalm-based.
- Though we highly revere Tradition,
especially as embodied in the writings of the Church
Fathers, only the Bible is read in public worship. The
Orthodox definitely uphold the central authority of
Scripture.
Conclusion
(from The Christian Activist, vol. 5,
1995, "Sola Scriptura: In the Vanity of Their
Minds," John Whiteford, 43)
"The Apostles delivered [their] knowledge
to the entire Church, and the Church, being the repository of
this treasure thus became "the pillar and ground of the
Truth" (1 Timothy 3:15). The testimony of the New Testament
is clear on this point: the early Christians had both oral and
written traditions which they received from Christ through the
Apostles. For written tradition they at first had only fragments
[of the overall corpus]-one local church had an Epistle, another
perhaps a Gospel. Gradually these writings were gathered together
into collections and ultimately they became the New Testament.
And how did these early Christians know which books were
authentic and which were not-for (as already noted) there were
numerous spurious epistles and gospels claimed by heretics to
have been written by Apostles? It was the oral Apostolic
Tradition that aided the Church in making this determination.
Protestants react violently to the idea of Holy
Tradition simply because the only form of it that they have
genuinely encountered is the concept of Tradition found in Roman
Catholicism. Contrary to the Roman view of Tradition, which is
personified by the Papacy, and develops new dogmas previously
unknown to the Church (such as Papal Infallibility, [the
Immaculate Conception, Purgatory, etc.])-the Orthodox do not
believe that Tradition grows or changes. Certainly when the
Church is faced with a heresy, it is forced to define more
precisely the difference between truth and error, but the Truth
does not change. It may be said that Tradition expands in the
sense that as the Church moves through history it does not forget
its experiences along the way, it remembers the saints that arise
in it, and it preserves the writings of those who have accurately
stated its faith; but the Faith itself was "once delivered
unto the saints" (Jude 3)."
|